Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | oafmcnamara | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Esper Pixie | ironbeagle | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Azorius Control , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Descend , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Restless Reef ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Restless Reef is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 35.38 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Restless Reef has a win rate of 73.0%, making it 1.9% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 32 | 75.5% | 11 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 9 | 69.6% | 2 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 6 | 67.3% | 2 |
| Urborg Scavengers | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 66.1% | 2 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 31 | 65.5% | 5 |
| Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 8 | 65.0% | 3 |
| Bring the Ending | Instant | 6 | 63.5% | 4 |
| Spiteful Hexmage | Creature — Human Warlock | 70 | 63.0% | 16 |
| Quick Study | Instant | 28 | 62.4% | 8 |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 142 | 61.8% | 58 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Restless Reef than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 7 | 86.8% | 72.7% | +14.1% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 81.6% | 72.8% | +8.8% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 8 | 81.2% | 72.5% | +8.8% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 13 | 80.0% | 72.9% | +7.1% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 7 | 80.3% | 73.3% | +7.0% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 5 | 78.1% | 72.0% | +6.1% |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 6 | 77.3% | 73.2% | +4.1% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 38 | 76.8% | 72.8% | +4.0% |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 31 | 76.9% | 73.0% | +3.9% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 36 | 76.2% | 72.9% | +3.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 2027 | 97.9% | 50.5% |
| Dimir Bounce | 484 | 98.0% | 50.0% |
| Esper Pixie | 278 | 17.8% | 56.3% |
| Dimir Demons | 99 | 98.0% | 51.6% |
| Dimir Control | 73 | 100.0% | 53.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.